Latest News

Law.com - Newswire
The day's top legal stories accompanied with summaries.
  • At DOJ's Request, Judge Dismisses FCPA Sting Case
    A federal judge on Tuesday dismissed a high-profile foreign bribery prosecution as he questioned the government's litigation tactics and legal theories underpinning the case. "This appears to be the end of a long and sad day in the annals of white-collar enforcement," U.S. District Judge Richard Leon said in court, several hours after prosecutors asked him to dismiss with prejudice the largest-ever Foreign Corrupt Practices Act case against individuals.
  • Court wades back into affirmative action
    The Supreme Court announced Tuesday it would revisit the divisive issue of affirmative action in higher education. But it will do so without Justice Elena Kagan, who recused herself, and without Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, who retired in 2006 after rescuing affirmative action from conservative attack three years earlier.
  • Prop 8 Backers Seek En Banc Review of Gay Marriage Decision
    Instead of heading straight to the U.S. Supreme Court, backers of the Prop 8 ban on gay marriage are seeking rehearing by an en banc panel of the 9th Circuit, arguing that the court's holding in Perry v. Brown conflicts with the Supreme Court's Baker v. Nelson, which let Minnesota deny same-sex couples the right to marry, and other cases.
  • D.C. Circuit Rejects Suit Over Gitmo Detainees' Deaths
    The D.C. Circuit on Tuesday rejected a suit that demanded the government pay damages to the representatives of two Guantanamo Bay detainees who died in custody. The panel did not reach the merits of the case but said the trial judge did not have jurisdiction to hear the dispute in the first place.
  • Conflicts Arise When Complying With U.S. and E.U. Laws
    Companies that collect employee information to comply with U.S. laws may find themselves running afoul of European Union regulations that guard employee privacy even in the case of information stored on company devices. And a new E.U. data protection proposal may make that information even harder to obtain.
  • Real Estate Tax Appeals

    In Michigan, property owners receive an annual assessment notice which identifies the value the local assessor believes is the value of a property owner's property.  If a property owner believes the assessment is incorrect, it is their responsibility to take immediate action and prepare to challenge the assessment. 

    If a property owner believes their assessment should be challenged, it is imperative that they engage a firm like Kickham Hanley (“KH”) to assist them in challenging the assessment.  KH has the requisite knowledge and experience to challenge assessments.  Whether the property at issue is an apartment complex, retail center, industrial or office building, or vacant land, KH can assist property owners in challenging their assessments.  The challenge is a technical process which requires a working knowledge of the administrative process.  It is rather common for KH to reach equitable settlements with local assessors.  However, where local assessors are overly insistent in refusing to reduce an assessment, and KH has evidence supporting its position, KH will take the matter to trial in the Tribunal and, if necessary, appeal the Tribunal's decision to the Michigan Court of Appeals.

    KH has challenged successfully the real estate tax assessments of virtually every classification of commercial property, including office, retail and industrial buildings, resulting in millions of dollars in reductions in the assessed value.  Among other recent victories, KH successfully challenged the tax assessments for Northland Mall in Southfield and Summit Place Mall in Waterford Township, Michigan. KH routinely handles tax appeals for owners of shopping malls, retail strip centers, industrial and commercial properties.

    KH is a firm that only represents property owners and can vigorously challenge assessments without a conflict with a municipality.  KH is not a tax service that settles a challenge at the first mention of litigation.  Rather, KH is a law firm that embraces the opportunity to challenge an assessment before the Tribunal.  KH will diligently represent a property owner's interest and will not settle or resolve their challenge until it makes sense to do so.    

    What is the cost of KH's services?  KH is compensated from the refund it achieves for the property owner for each year under appeal.  KH typically receives 33.33% of the reduction in taxes (typically paid out of a refund of previously paid taxes), if the appeal is settled prior to a trial and 45% of the reduction if a trial is necessary to resolve the matter.  KH will consider an hourly arrangement in limited circumstances.

    Michigan has experienced an unprecedented and precipitous reduction in real estate values which should cause every property owner to evaluate their property's value.  If a property's true cash value is not consistent with the annual assessment, the property owner should challenge the assessment.  Kickham Hanley stands ready to make those challenges.

    For more detailed information concerning  property assessment, click HERE.